數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記對象研究
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
林沐政
中國政法大學(xué)民商經(jīng)濟法學(xué)院
摘要： 數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記制度正處于探索建設(shè)階段，從北京等四地公布的相關(guān)文件來看，四地方數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記的對象在試點層面存在著定義與要件不一致、具體登記內(nèi)容存在差別、不予登記的情形不統(tǒng)一的實施現(xiàn)狀。從既有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的數(shù)據(jù)保護模式和我國數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記制度來看，數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記對象的要求仍然是對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)和競爭法規(guī)則的反映。數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記對象不應(yīng)該局限于商業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)，且不以數(shù)據(jù)規(guī)模為條件，而應(yīng)當(dāng)具備價值性、固定性、處理性等要件，數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度需要以明確登記對象為核心，從法律完善、規(guī)范適用、平臺建設(shè)和配套制度等層面加以完善。
中圖分類號：D63; D922.1文獻標(biāo)識碼：ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.06.011
引用格式：林沐政.數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記對象研究［J］.網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理，2024，43（6）：72-79,87.
引用格式：林沐政.數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記對象研究［J］.網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理，2024，43（6）：72-79,87.
Study on the object of data intellectual property rights registration
Lin Muzheng
Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School, China University of Political Science and Law
Abstract： The data intellectual property registration system is in the stage of exploration and construction, and from the relevant documents published by Beijing and other cities, it can be seen that the objects of data intellectual property registration in the four places have inconsistent definitions and requirements, different specific registration contents, and inconsistent implementation of non-registration at the pilot level. From the perspective of the data protection model of the existing intellectual property system and China′s data intellectual property registration system, the requirements for the registration object of data intellectual property rights are still a reflection of the rules of intellectual property rights and competition law. The requirements for the object of registration of data intellectual property rights remain a reflection of intellectual property and competition law rules. The object of registration of data IPRs should not be limited to commercial data and should not be conditional on the size of the data, but should have the elements like value, fixity and processability.The data intellectual property rights system should be centered on clarifying the registration objects and improving them from the aspects of legal improvement, standardized application, platform construction and supporting systems.
Key words : data; intellectual property; registration system; data rights confirmation
引言
數(shù)據(jù)是國家基礎(chǔ)性戰(zhàn)略資源，為實現(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù)賦能，近年來我國就數(shù)據(jù)保護實施了一系列重要部署。2022年12月19日，國務(wù)院正式公布《關(guān)于構(gòu)建數(shù)據(jù)基礎(chǔ)制度更好發(fā)揮數(shù)據(jù)要素作用的意見》，即廣為人知的“數(shù)據(jù)二十條”，該意見提出“研究數(shù)據(jù)產(chǎn)權(quán)登記的新方式”，由國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局牽頭確立了北京、江蘇、浙江等八個地方為數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)工作試點，地方層面陸續(xù)出臺了數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的登記管理辦法。數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)登記對象的確定直接影響數(shù)據(jù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護邊界，對我國數(shù)據(jù)保護在理論和實踐層面均有重要意義。
本文詳細內(nèi)容請下載：
http://www.shi-ke.cn/resource/share/2000006051
作者信息：
林沐政
（中國政法大學(xué)民商經(jīng)濟法學(xué)院，北京100091）
此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng)，未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。